10/19/2021 0 Comments Shutterstock Images Prices
Elephant Tee Mens -Image by. Clothing / Mens Clothing / Mens T-Shirts & Tank Tops / Mens Graphic Tees Reduced price. South Hill Supercenter Boydton, 23917. Sign in Create an account. Buy Elephant Tee Mens -Image by Shutterstock at Walmart.com.
![]() ![]() ![]() Shutterstock Images Prices Download Or CostThat's a loss of somewhere between $350 and $1,520 with the old levels.Now if we make a percentage commission and it would have been. The total for contributors at the top old level 38 cents would earn them $3,400 at the cost of $1,520 for the company. And at the old rate, we'd get as a new person, 25c a download or cost the company $350. The problem is, not enough of these to make up for the 10-11-12ยข subs? So some are better and others are lower.I'm not sure what they are saying but, maybe something like this.I don't see a 9000 pack? Oh well, the 9,000 divided by 12, is 750 a month, and the annual prepaid plan I'll guess? That seems to fit the worst case.SS gets 22 cents a download, which would be $1900, I think you said that.That leaves the last resort, the bottom of the food chain, which is unfortunately us.Check my math. If they raise prices, buyers will leave and go someplace else. Does that matter? If I make $500 selling old images or $500 selling new images, what's the difference? So I find their claim that this is to reward us, is just pouring on the syrup to make some sour dealings look sweet.Anyway if I understood the math and argument right, old system, SS was losing money with the pay scales and levels, because they cut the subs packs or because they were always losing money on those, under the assumption that buyers would seldom use the whole pack. But if the images sell, what's wrong? The claim is SS wants to reward the people who are working hard now. (sarcastic no thanks)I can understand they have people who stopped uploading years ago, that are at the highest rate, and just resting. Anything in the pink, should work out that the company is losing money, but paying us, over our actual percentage.I'm generally unhappy about the annual reset, which could have been a rolling average, calculated each year or something more reasonable than, Go Back to Start, thank you for your diligent efforts supplying us with great images. Microsoft phone recovery toolCurrently that's roughly the 50 image, annual package price. They can either give us 25% of every dollar or 15% of $1.66 an image. That was true back before 2010, so the price has always been below the commissions.This isn't mis-pricing, it's the result of being forced into competitive pricing.Lets say SS decides to be kind and go back to paying us a minimum of a crummy quarter. Even at 25c for us, some of the income from subs was lower than the cost.Remember the scheme or at least the math calculation, that someone could buy a subscription, download every image, and make a profit. The idea was always stated that they based that on buyers not using the entire purchase. SS is actually charging more, but people are so angry they don't take the time to look at the real market or what the competition is charging. But the simple point it, if SS charges $1.66 an image, so they can pay us 25 cents, we'll have no buyers and they will go out of business and we'll be out of the market selling through SS.Check my math please. Minimum is 2 cents for a DL for us by the way.123RF charges 90c an image, how are they doing for you in sales and income?SS charges $2,388 for the same annual sub pack that DT or IS do above and that's 27c an image.Who's under pricing? Maybe all of them. 225 centsIS charges $1,992 for the same which is 22c an image.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorAntonio ArchivesCategories |